One of the problems with the recent phenomenon of food brands getting into NFTs is that food is actually quite different from NFTs.
If youâ€™re a business thatâ€™s really good at, like, nailing the economics of mass-producing hamburger meat, thereâ€™s no guarantee youâ€™re going to have the same success peddling tokens on a blockchain.
Take McDonaldâ€™s, the fast-food megachain that announced its first collection of NFTs last month in conjunction with the return of the McRib (essentially a soupy version of a pork sandwich). The McRib is available for a limited time each year, typically starting around October or November.
In this yearâ€™s press release, the company described its ten McRib NFTs as â€œdigital versions of the fan favorite sandwichâ€ â€“ something to cherish during those long summer months when the physical product isnâ€™t on sale.
i present to u the most important NFT. RT for a chance to win one of ten exclusive #McRibNFT
no purch. nec. 50 U.S./DC, 18+ only. winners need crypto wallet to receive NFT. rules: https://t.co/2QRhsPlpur pic.twitter.com/KYmWI67PhG
â€” McDonald’s (@McDonalds) November 1, 2021
The NFT drop was also a sweepstakes; McDonaldâ€™s has been reaching out to winners on Twitter in recent weeks.
But on Friday night, a trader with the handle @ok_0S noticed that an early transaction to what appeared to be the Ethereum address associated with the official McRib NFT collection contained a racial slur, inscribed directly on the Ethereum blockchain.
CoinDesk has found numerous connections between the transaction and the NFT collection, presenting a case study for why major brands would be well served to approach this technology with caution. Numerous attempts to reach McDonaldâ€™s for comment Friday evening were unsuccessful.
The digital trail appears to show that McDonaldâ€™s official Twitter account is directly linked to the Ethereum blockchain transaction containing the slur.
On Nov. 1, McDonaldâ€™s brand Twitter began promoting its McRib NFT contest with a link to the sweepstakesâ€™ rules:
That rules page in turn links to McDonaldâ€™s verified Rarible account, which prominently features the 0x2ef743b24a915a5d6c489479865a4e98d191efac Ethereum address. This address is the creator of the McRib NFT contract.
The first of a total of 11 transactions associated with the address is a deposit of 0.000069 ETH. As a part of a transaction, Ethereum users can choose to add hexadecimal data. This data can be used to send messages, and can even be used to anonymously negotiate standoffs, as in the case of the $600 million Poly Network hack.
Read more: Poly Network Prepares for Hacker to Return Millions in Stolen Crypto
The deposit in question includes data which, when decoded, reads â€œay yo n***a gibsme sum of dat mcrib.â€
It is unclear if the author of this message was an employee or a contractor of McDonalds, but it is the first transaction sent to an address that would go on to mint the official McDonaldâ€™s NFTs, implying that the sender had foreknowledge of the project.
The senderâ€™s address, which owns the Ethereum Name Service domain the-boss.eth, shows that they are a prolific NFT flipper, OpenSea user, and has used various DeFi protocols across 729 network transactions.
In addition to the link between the McDonalds verified Twitter account and the verified Rarible NFT account, CoinDesk found that one recipient of the NFTs associated with the address where the slur was posted, â€œBTCMike,â€ had been contacted by McDonalds to receive the NFT:
hey @BitcoinMiike iâ€™m trying to DM u about the McRib NFT, help me out? Follow @McDonalds in next 48 hrs
â€” McDonald’s (@McDonalds) November 22, 2021
Who wants this?
Ultimately, the link between the transaction and the NFTs appears to be conclusive. Someone with knowledge of the account, likely an employee or contractor for McDonaldâ€™s, wrote and posted it prior to the creation of the NFTs, perhaps assuming it would never be found.
While other brands have experienced high-profile flubs with their early forays into NFTs, such as the Time Magazine drop which was exploited and saw the majority of the nearly 5,000 NFTs go to bots, this may be the biggest blunder yet.
Finding this message requires some degree of technical knowledge; McDonalds likely doesnâ€™t have the internal expertise to realize that such an event would be permanently associated with the project.
Aside from brands cavalierly wading into the space to sometimes disastrous results, it also remains unclear who theyâ€™re taking the risks for, exactly.
Read More: Who Really Wants Corporate NFTs?
Many NFT efforts from major brands have failed to see significant traction. The McRib NFTs, for instance, have never been traded.
Nonetheless, major corporations continue to move into the NFT space with inadequate precautions, and insiders seem more than willing to make fools of them for doing so.